Walter said:
Hello and welcome to the forum! I always enjoy revisiting these old topics, but most of these threads have already been pulled.
Thank you and good to be here :)
Walter said:
Not if a result of the merging meant they shared the same power. When the child was in control, the ability he used to tame the Beast of Darkness was pretty fantastic (also worthy of note, the episode title during that feat was "Superior Being.")
The episode is Titled "Superhuman(Jnanin)" in the Dark Horse installment, and basically from what i've gathered Jnanin is a vast knowledge of the supernatural, it's a little more indepth so i'll just post the link and you can read for yourself and see that it fits pretty well in with berserk universe
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jnana
This adds some consideration to Schierke's theory that the boy is some emmisary or king Hanafubuku himself, im sure it could be made sense of but it doesn't explain Zodd or the uncanny resemblance to Casca, which is why we are all more or less convinced it must be Guts child
But the boy's power is very similar to very powerful magi, as Schierke once said, powerful enough magi can even fly and that boy to have gotten up to those "branches", that could have taken the magi ability of flight or the flight ability
is those branches as we see him in a sense, "fly" along the branches i.e the "secret paths" that powerful beings like king hanafubuku are capable of using(further giving some credence to Schierke's theory)
Although with me, along with the majority think it's more likely it is Guts child but also to go along with my own theory(s), I think he gained his knowledge either from being intuned with the Idea Of Evil/a deep layer of the astral world or as he lay alongside Griffith/Femto's spirit
And if he is seperated from Griffith, maybe now he is simply gifted with tremendous knowledge of the trinity - Physical/Astral/Origin which allows him to do most of the things that usually only the most powerful magi should be able to do but is also pure of Griffiths stain(this could also still make perfect sense even if he's still a part of Griffith but becomes pure when Griffith "projects" him as all parts of Griffiths evil spirit now remain or have all returned to the source)
Walter said:
Casca was able to touch and hold the child. That's fundamentally different from astral projection and what Griffith does with souls.
I dont know how you can say this with certainty, there is seemingly alot of touching going on
REMOVED
And like it has been said many times, the Astral world is the world of the dead. Isidro asks (quoting Dark Horse)"Little complicated but it's ghosts right? schierke responds "Those are the ethereal bodies that
your ethereal body percieves"
(I usually read the Dark Horse version but, but in this case the translations have little difference so shouldn't hurt)
REMOVED
Basically proving you can touch these human ethereal(ghost) bodies if it is sensed strongly enough
Walter said:
I don't think you've thought this all the way through.
Why? The boys spirit(perhaps what i've been meaning to say this entire time) lies within Griffith, and as with the ghosts he's not in some other room when he's projecting. there has been no indication that he can give form to the souls in the otherside of the planet. But, i
can see Miura rationalize it all with the Ganishka tree, esspecially since it caused the world to sink into a deeper realm of the astral world, maybe now the childs spirit can roam more freely, Griffith need'nt project him so much as simply let him "out". And Griffith did show up for the battle at Vritanis did he not? Unless you mean why he wasn't sensed, which is something i've admitted is the hole in the theory
Walter said:
That's an over embellishment of the damage the Dragon Slayer does. It inflicts wounds on an astral body.
Dont think i've ever read "astral body", i've read "ethereal body" that roam the "astral world"
and as i've shown above, ethereal = spirit(perhaps soul was the wrong word, but astral world is just another way of saying
spirit world) and thus astral = ethereal in your case
Walter said:
It's a good question, but it could just be that when the child is in control of the body, which originally belonged to him, that there is no trace of Griffith in those moments.
As mentioned above, I believe the boy is absolved of Griffiths stains when he is projected(or was released) as the evil returned to the source and is there to stay
Walter said:
Nah, look more closely at the moon.
What's wrong with the moon?
REMOVED
Walter said:
Not just weak, but rather nonsensical. It's the child's body that Griffith possessed, not the other way around.
I dont believe it's beyond the realm of possibility that a being like Griffith can't remove the Spirit of a vessel that yes, once belonged to someone else but his spirit is clearly the dominant force here thus his appearence and thus the body basically belongs to him now. We dont need to act like we have the facts here and understand the extent of the abilities of a member of the God Hand
Also Flora did mention that some dead spirits wander the interstice but they eventually accept their deaths and move on or become unable to maintain their ethereal bodies and thus pass away into a deeper layer
The boys spirit is much more powerful than those of the average wondering human souls and that's a given, so i dont see the absurdity
Walter said:
It wasn't as much of a prophecy as that the child intercepted the mass dream from the Falcon of Light and gave Guts specific instructions after it.
The mass dreams had nothing to do with Casca or her being tied to a pillar of fire etc(pretty specific indeed) nor was it worded cryptically like the child said it, it was very Skull Knight/God Hand-ish style of telling someone something.
Here's the only "mass dream" i can remember relating to this particular event, correct me if im wrong(goes without saying though really)
REMOVED