'Twin Peaks' co-creator Mark Frost explained why a fourth season of the series would be difficult without late auteur David Lynch.
www.indiewire.com
Before David Lynch died, he was apparently in talks with Twin Peaks' co-creator Mark Frost about potentially continuing the show. But Frost recently put the brakes on any continuation discussion:
“We had talked a little bit about where a fourth season might go,” Frost recently told Empire, “but with David having left us, it’s hard to imagine doing anything beyond this. It certainly feels like it closed the circle.”
I find the parallel to Berserk and its continuation interesting. Frost was far more integral to Twin Peaks than Mori was to Berserk, yet without Lynch he doesn't feel it's appropriate to continue it. And if you look around the Internet about this news, you'll find that most fans feel the same. I agree, of course. It wouldn't feel right to continue the story without David Lynch at the helm.
So, then why is the same scenario when applied to Berserk more agreeable to some people? What if Frost had said something similar to Mori, such as:
"30 years ago, David and I talked about how Twin Peaks would ultimately end. And even though he didn't leave behind even a rough outline, the foley artist and key grips who worked with David on all seasons of Twin Peaks are still around. And I think I have a good idea about a few of the lines of dialogue there would be. So we'll be doing Seasons 4-5 on Showtime next year." That'd sound insane, right?
I think for Berserk, the appetite for an ending is overriding the common sense notion that it's a bad idea to try and continue it without the artist responsible for it. Whereas for Twin Peaks, most people can look at The Return, squint, and see that there's already an ending in their hands. And so, laying it to rest is an easier proposal.