DarkBlademaster
Jesus cries when he looks at me.
Well I never understood this part, when the holy chain knights come on to the area of where the first eclipes took place.
"The fifth sign of the apocolipes, the time of the suns death."
"The red lake exists by the eastern cities new and old names"
"So, in other words, it is proof of a fifth use"
"That use brings us the dark hawk. The blind king of the white sheep serves as shepord to the villany of the black sheep..."
What I put in bold is what seems most confusing. I once thought the blind king reffered to the king of midland, but perhapes it referres to void? These sentences might give us alot more then we think about voids past. He is the blind king, I have no idea who the white sheep could be, but the black sheep could be the apostles.
Now speaking of void, there has always come into question "Was void the first godshand?" (at least i think so). Well its clarified... yes. This text proves there were only 5 eclipes, one of course for each godshand.
Now, what the hell does the underlined text mean? Eastern cities of new and old? A city of the old could be gaiserics emipre... shouldn't that mean something? But if they say the lake exists by now and old names, and the eclipes was on the lake... maybe gaiserics empire is in the abyss? (Or something like it)
"The fifth sign of the apocolipes, the time of the suns death."
"The red lake exists by the eastern cities new and old names"
"So, in other words, it is proof of a fifth use"
"That use brings us the dark hawk. The blind king of the white sheep serves as shepord to the villany of the black sheep..."
What I put in bold is what seems most confusing. I once thought the blind king reffered to the king of midland, but perhapes it referres to void? These sentences might give us alot more then we think about voids past. He is the blind king, I have no idea who the white sheep could be, but the black sheep could be the apostles.
Now speaking of void, there has always come into question "Was void the first godshand?" (at least i think so). Well its clarified... yes. This text proves there were only 5 eclipes, one of course for each godshand.
Now, what the hell does the underlined text mean? Eastern cities of new and old? A city of the old could be gaiserics emipre... shouldn't that mean something? But if they say the lake exists by now and old names, and the eclipes was on the lake... maybe gaiserics empire is in the abyss? (Or something like it)