Excuse me if this has been mentioned in depth, I did a quick search for a few pages and only found bits and pieces of what I wanted to discuss. Anyways, kind of got a spark in an idea this morning, I was thinking about the current "struggles" that involve Guts and Skull Knight and the "fish" metaphor. Now it's obvious (well, at least to my notion at this point) Causality isn't something that can be completely destroyed or anything of the sort, and imo at best Skull Knight and Guts are becoming new variables within it that have potential to distort the -intended- flow of the spiral.
But what I ask is to what degree have they really been successful? Skull Knight saves Guts and Casca during the Eclipse, but it is Guts and Casca's premature son that becomes a device of sorts at Albion (correct me if I'm wrong here) for the incarnation ceremony, which might not have been completely possible had their child hadn't followed them to the tower (namely Casca). Is it possible that this is still within the intent of the Idea and/or Causality, or can it be that Guts and Skull Knight are considered an unknown factor and still adapted as some new variable? Also, as the topic says, if they "have" made progress, what, if any, do you feel shows this specifically?
But what I ask is to what degree have they really been successful? Skull Knight saves Guts and Casca during the Eclipse, but it is Guts and Casca's premature son that becomes a device of sorts at Albion (correct me if I'm wrong here) for the incarnation ceremony, which might not have been completely possible had their child hadn't followed them to the tower (namely Casca). Is it possible that this is still within the intent of the Idea and/or Causality, or can it be that Guts and Skull Knight are considered an unknown factor and still adapted as some new variable? Also, as the topic says, if they "have" made progress, what, if any, do you feel shows this specifically?