Recent content by ranemaka13

Why must you compare the movie to the comics to know how good the movie is? You watched the movie, that should be all you need. Don't bother with useless comparisons: just accept the movie as a seperate work, with its own strengths and weaknesses. (and there's plenty of both) I finally watched...

Then it sounds like this episode was a success. :carcus:

I know, I know, but did you watch the new theatrical trailer? I think it's a bit more expansive than status updates and duck-face profile pics. David Fincher is directing it, I have respect for him, and he's competent enough to make this worth seeing.

Well, that's debateable, but pointless to debate. Moving on: The Social Network

Yes, really. No shit. It may not be wholly original, but I'm not dreading it by any means. It seems much more tasteful than "Dinner for Schmucks" or other low-grade comedies that have been coming out of the woodwork lately.

Due Date: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sm6qugdbyGI

Haha. I don't even have the cover; who buys cds nowadays? Regardless, the album itself is good. this is good, too: Suckers - Wild Smile

I'm not sure why this is so funny:

I remember you being pretty explicit on your distaste for the book and your reccommendations against it were quite strong, as well.

Praise be to all who hath contributed to this thread. You've saved my slow days at work. :casca:

and now: Buster Keaton (and the poor devil's deaf!) Haha, yeah, i kinda hope he grows into them.

Introducing: Charles Spencer Chaplin

I should hope not. Make audiences read a book for christ's sake; it won't kill em.

Danielewski invented tedium. I've never been so bored. I still haven't finished it; haven't picked it up since the day I put it down, and (despite what some people have told me) i have NO INTEREST IN EVER READING ANOTHER WORD OF THIS TERRIBLE TERRIBLE BOOK. The next book he writes should be...