Perhaps. But ... and don't take this the wrong way ... what meaning could be derived from it? Jung's archetypes have always struck me as so vague that you can squeeze virtually anything into one of several generically named boxes, and they end up pretty meaningless (a hero... rises... through ... conflict!). Elmer Fudd probably has a Jungian archetype that fits him squarely.
Maybe I'm missing something and you have something more to offer by way of comparison to these archetypes?
Sorry to answer so late, while i do agree that Jung's archetypes are kind of vague, they have been used as guidelines in storytelling from time to time, so it wouldnt surprise me if miura knew about them or were inspired in some degree by them, now let me explain my thoughs on what i meant with the Moonlight Boy being a Divine child.
Divine Child archetype is associated with qualities of innocence, purity and redemption.
This are aspects that the Moonlingth boy have shown, many characters have like Danan have stated that the boy have no malice, and its stated by farnese that the boy could had been the thing that could make Casca fully recover from her trauma.
The Divine Child can also be viewed as a symbol of unity which was born from the tension of opposites and as a result brings hope of a change for the better. This view of the Divine Child makes him a saviour figure, who brings hope of integration and redemption for us all.
Now this is pure speculation but in the context of the history i think the boy was meant to be used as the bridge for casca and guts to reunite, and dont forget all those panels that Miura showed us of guts party being together as a family were after they boy appeared on the island.
Some characteristic the divine child have are:
- The Divine Child is both helpless and all powerful at the same time.
- The helplessness comes from the fact that it’s youth ensures that it is still reliant on the adult or more mature influences around him, but all-powerful because that same youth and vitality makes him the centre of attention of all around.
- The attention has mutual benefits, both enabling the Divine Child to flourish but also bringing to the parent figure a sense of pride and achievement which benefits them too.
- If properly nurtured the archetype will develop into that of a manly King.
- The Divine Child is usually the first of the boyhood archetypes to develop and provides the source of a boy’s enthusiasm for life.
- The archetype creates for those who possess it a sense of peace and joy as well as an willingness to embrace life and the adventures which it offers.
- The Divine Child creates within an individual the sense of anticipation and excitement at the beginning of a new journey or challenge.
On this asepct i agree that the moonlight boy dont fit all but he fits the first and parts of the sixth and seventh
Also Jung proposed that these archetypes have "Shadows" something like evil or negative versions of themselves and i think this is what Miura played when he merged Femto and the boy in the incarnation ceremony.
Now the divine child has two shadows that being the: High-Chair Tyrant and the Weakling Prince.
This is again speculation, but what i think miura did was used Griffith/Femto as the literal Shadow of the boy and played around as to portrait that the boy and the "shadow" are in a constant struggle for control.
well this are some thoughs i have maybe i'm thinking to deep on the subject and i'm wrong in all, who knows maybe i'll go make thread on speculation were i go deeper into this theory.