I have to point out, as I did when that episode came out, that this directly contradicts what we're shown during Ganishka's backstory in volume 34. He was born into the royal family of a small kingdom, became king and then conquered his neighbors to create a giant empire. This is why the Kurultai makes no sense: there was no council Ganishka could have ignored. That's just not how it happened at all according to Kentarou Miura. And the more you think about it, the less it makes sense (like where that other emperor came from).
Miura told us the state of Kushan at the time of Ganishka's birth, but nations rise and fall, and 303 gives us small hints of the historical relations between Kushan and its neighbors (for the record I typo'd my last post where I mentioned episode 376, it was 377). I haven't read a high quality translation of these latest chapters to refer to Silat's dialogue with greater precision, and depending on the way it was written in the original Japanese, it could certainly have been delivered better, e.g., if Silat had specifically referred to the kurultai as an "ancient" tradition, as he later refers to the many upheavals and wars Kushan has experienced "since ancient times" in the translation I read. In this sense it seems to me more like an expansion of what we know regarding the historical conditions of the Kushan culture, and not a glaring contradiction.
I think this is a major point of bifurcation in our perspectives. To me, this sort of detail is a narrative device where I believe the team behind the continuation deserves a certain leeway to develop the story with its new constraints, as opposed to other major missteps. Of course, if the other inconsistencies and missteps have ingrained a greater sensitivity to these minor details in parts of the readership, that's understandable and we can agree to disagree.
A year is a long time. I actually don't think it's meant to have been so long since it happened. But that's not really the point. We are shown and told that the whole world was changed by the Great Wave of the Astral World. It wasn't localized and it wasn't progressive.
Your interpretation that it's only happening now where the Kushans live, a year later, is simply not supported by the story as Miura had established it. We're told that Falconia keeps getting refugees from all nations and in episode 358, Griffith surmises that it's the only place that still has a government on the continent (to advance his idea that he'll build a second empire akin to Gaizeric's). And more simply, the change brought on by Fantasia was meant to be extreme and immediate. This is why we see the Sea Horse having to face the Sea God. It's a whole new world.
Moreover, what we're shown here isn't the Great Wave of the Astral World slowly going over that city. It's Rakshas "opening up the gates to the astral world" (a notion that doesn't make sense with what we know of Berserk's world as it had been established by Kentarou Miura). It's completely different from (and unrelated to) the Great Wave of the Astral World. So nothing supports this idea that it's happening with a delay. It's just not what's shown happening in the episode.
Well, referring to
Puella's translation of 358, that isn't quite what Griffith says. He qualifies his statements as referring to "many" nations and Puella's translation even has him using multiple conditionals in the same sentence to describe Midland's current geopolitical position with regards to other kingdoms:
Griffith: Currently, the governments of many other countries have stopped functioning.
Griffith: Cities, streets or towns are isolated everywhere, still being infringed upon by trolls.
Griffith: This country, Midland, could be the only one that still keeps the form of a state on this continent, probably.
So again, your interpretation doesn't actually show us any explicit contradiction in what we're seeing, in regards to the ongoing persistence of the Kushan Empire. If anything, that makes sense because it is a far more powerful nation than other kingdoms we glimpse in the territories around Midland from the Golden Age, so it's reasonable that they would endure for longer.
Furthermore, I'd argue that your stance makes less sense than this interpretation because what is the alternative? 303 shows us that Berserk's world is a planet much like our own, and that everything we're seeing takes place over a fraction of its geography. We know nothing of humans elsewhere. I guess you can argue that means they don't exist, but hopefully we can both agree that that is most likely not the case (or else why did Kentaro Miura show us the entire planet at all?).
Was the Great Wave of the Astral World simply an extinction event and there are no humans elsewhere anymore? Because all of Griffith's statements and reflections on Gaiseric refer to the surrounding continent, and we're given no reason to believe he's ventured farther abroad in search of refugees to integrate into Falconia. Hopefully it is self-evident why this doesn't seem like the most plausible narrative path for the story take. It seems more logically parsimonious to argue for a gradual collapse of the existing world than an instantaneous one.
Lastly, and I mention this not out of pedantry but because these small linguistic details are also very interesting to me, is there a particular reason you choose Gaizeric as the transliteration of that character's name? My understanding of the behelit vs beherit debate given the ambiguity of l vs r when translating Japanese, is that beherit refers to an existing concept and behelit does not. Similarly, Gaiseric has a real world parallel with the same name, much like Kushan. I've also read that the morphophonology of g vs k suffers a similar effect due to rendaku which has led me to wonder if Ganishka should not have been transliterated as
Kanishka, in keeping with the references to real world historical figures.
Lastly, yes actually, we are pretty much told that they can handle it because they've tough and have been fighting since ancient times. That is what Silat's answer to Roderick is about. He doesn't say the consequences of the Great Wave of the Astral World haven't reached them yet. He says they can handle it and that's why they're fine despite everything.
Silat isn't an omniscient narrator, so what is the contradiction here? I can only see it if your interpretation of instantaneous collapse is taken as fact. He's just espousing nationalist drivel about how strong Kushan is and will probably be proven wrong in short order. If anything, the contradiction I see here is that Silat shouldn't be foolish enough to say this given what he has experienced firsthand over the course of the story.
Not sure what that's got to do with anything. People on social media who've never bought a volume of the manga and can barely remember the characters' names aren't "the ideal population to sample" about the quality of the story in my book, and it's not like it's a numbers' game anyway. I could be in a room with a hundred flat-earthers and I still wouldn't think the Earth is flat.
No, I agree, but you've simply described the opposite extreme, whereas I would situate the typical skullknight.net user on the other tail of the normal distribution of Berserk readers. Neither are representative of the average experience, which is unfortunately what most economically-driven pursuits in our world use to measure their success, and it appears that the average Berserk reader is more or less content with the continuation. I'm not making any particular point here except to say that the experience of people on this forum is simply a window into a small fraction of people who read Berserk, and likely the most fanatical fraction at that, but that the perspective of mega fans is still just one perspective among many.
You seem to be confused about what I said. I was criticizing the fact the Continuation team is reusing visuals from previous parts of the story without understanding what they mean, which results in a whole bunch of nonsense.
I'm not confused about anything. I think it's a reference to previous visual motifs and that it is not nonsense because it is
similar to but different from what we saw before, as the situation at hand is similar to but different from what has happened previously in the manga. The artistic merit of dropping references like these is another debate entirely. As I mentioned in my previous post, at least until we see what happens next, I find the visual parallel between what's happening at the Kushan palace and what happened at the Count's castle relatively interesting, whereas the reuse of elements like the trolls is rather mediocre.
Haha, this is an exceptional exercise in rationalization. The reality is there is a close-up on him before a shockwave is sent from his body, and immediately afterwards we are told and shown that "the gates of the astral world" are opening (a nonsensical notion, that's not how this is supposed to work according to what Miura had set up in the story).
If what's supposed to be implied by this is that Rakshas
isn't the cause of it, then it's extremely poor storytelling. And guess what? That's the point I made in my post!
This is the real difference between our perspectives: you're saying "ok this is clumsy but they must be meaning this, surely" whereas I'm just listing the many ways in which what they're doing breaks the established canon. Whether a member of the God Hand is behind Rakshas or not doesn't fundamentally change anything to what I'm saying. There's tons of inconsistencies in any case.
Serialized forms of media such as manga drip feed us information. We don't know exactly what is happening for you to reach these conclusions. If anything, why should we expect things to work like they did before? Many of your responses to other details I've mentioned hinge on the before vs after of the astral and physical planes merging in the story, which rewrote the metaphysical rules of the world entirely. Before a specialized artifact was required to incite these kinds of events, now there is no such requirement. This hardly seems contradictory.
You're reaching premature conclusions about the storytelling of a scene that we've only just started to see unfold. Furthermore, given what I already said - Rakshas is confused about what's going on and Daiba explicitly remarks that an apostle shouldn't be able to cause what's happening with the astral gates - it seems clear that this scene is foreshadowing whatever we'll see in the next few episodes. Do I have hope that it will make sense? Not really, but I will reserve my judgment for when we see it!
This doesn't make sense though. This is just not how it's supposed to work.
The Qliphoth is a place you travel to, not something you summon and then monsters just spring into existence everywhere in a 3 mile radius.
That's not how this works at all... You're confusing the Interstice with the place where the God Hand conducts apostle ceremonies, which couldn't be more different as one is the border between the worlds and the other is very deep inside the astral world. More importantly, this just isn't what happens in this episode. We're told through Farnese that "the Qliphoth has appeared", which makes no sense mind you, but that's still what they're doing here. The Qliphoth is a specific territory of the astral world that is neither the Interstice nor the unnamed place where the God Hand conducts ceremonies.
And we also clearly see Rakshas making it happen, it's not just his presence but a shockwave he sends out that washes over people.
What's more important is that it doesn't make sense. There is no reason for a tornado to appear above the palace. I mean I did go over this already so I'm not going to repeat myself but they're reusing things without understanding them and it's just stupid.
I'll acquiesce to having been imprecise when I wrote my reply last night, but I don't think these things are as solidly defined as your reply indicates. Furthermore, you keep using examples from before the astral and physical worlds merged as if they're indicative of what we should expect afterwards. I tried to investigate previous discussions regarding the qliphoth and the interstice here on SK.net and found a few, but unfortunately Puella's systematic translations start just
after 215, so my access to better non-Japanese text was fairly limited because it does seem that the Dark Horse has some inaccuracies during that sequence.
Do you think that the qliphoth manifests in fixed, invariant locations in the physical world? In 215, Schierke mentions that astral bodies gravitate towards places of similar od. Specifically, her dialogue here is something like:
Schierke: This is the astral world, and not a very nice part. The astral world's region of darkness, qliphoth. The vast extent of the astral world comprises many regions, each with its own characteristic atmosphere. Ethereal bodies tend to gravitate towards ods of the same nature. Warm ods would be drawn towards warmth... Conversely, this place here, the darkness where hearts steeped in darkness congregate... that is qliphoth.
So what is the precise relationship between these elements? Do creatures with dark od travel to qliphoth exclusively, or does qliphoth manifest in the dark places where such beings gather? To me this is ambiguous, perhaps you will illuminate me with the original text. In 377, as Rakshas begins to emerge, Daiba notices his evil prana, probably tantamount to dark od. To me the implication is that Rakshas' od is an anchor drawing other beings with dark od, and that qliphoth is manifesting accordingly. Daiba seems to find this situation very abnormal, so I think we'll find out next episode what's really happening. I suspect some greater evil is coordinating these events to create a bridge for itself to appear in the city.
Just to be clear, I quite like Daiba's character, but we do know the limits of his abilities. The Pishacha were created using Ganishka's power, as was the "artificial beherit", and Daiba didn't summon the Kundalini, it was a magical creature he charmed/tamed with his master's help. His power relied on the Kundalini, not vice versa. More broadly, during his fight against Guts' group, he's confounded by what happens while Schierke, despite being at a disadvantage, quickly works out what he's doing and how to counteract it. He can't see Schierke's body of light and doesn't seem able to leave his own body in that manner, which is why he views the encounter as Eastern magic versus Western magic, whereas Schierke recognizes it as just different applications of the same fundamental principles.
After Ganishka's death, we see Daiba's abilities by themselves, and they are mostly related to speaking to and controlling animals (i.e. he's a glorified snake charmer). Which is cool and I think would have been used in interesting ways by Miura, but it's far from the sort of things an accomplished magician can perform. This is why it's offensive to see him put on the same level as the Great Gurus given that they are actual world-level experts with a much deeper understanding of the world. It betrays an intellectual laziness and lack of imagination from the Continuation team, where instead of making use of his specificities, they've turned him into "default magic expert" so he can comment on what's happening.
And yet, we're given earlier precedent that Daiba
does know quite a lot about magic and the astral world. As I mentioned before, he gave Ganishka his beherit, and he's the only human magical practitioner we've seen well-versed enough in the dark arts to produce something like the artificial beherit Ganishka used to incarnate for a second time. The actual extent of his knowledge is rather ambiguous, in this sense, even if he took advantage of Ganishka's great power to further his own art. Schierke is also consistently portrayed as a prodigal practitioner of magic and her having an advanced intuition for the mechanics of metaphysics doesn't necessarily cast Daiba in a negative light. That said, I don't disagree that characters like Ged far surpass him, but given that he's the foremost Kushan magician that we've seen and the party is currently in Kushan lands, I don't think what we're seeing is outlandish.