Every time I read people questioning "why the continuation is happening if there are so many holes to fill", I wonder how you're missing the point Mori has made time and time again, including in this interview.
It is his interpretation of his best friend's wishes that Miura would've wanted him to try to complete the work.
You're the one missing the point here. Mori wasn't oathbound to continue the manga in this specific manner, with no break in episode or volume numbers. And in fact he isn't doing it himself; he's only supervising Kurosaki and his team, who are the ones creating the continuation. As a reminder, these are people who Miura wouldn't let contribute to Berserk beyond the smallest and most elementary tasks, by his and their own admission.
Anyhow, what people are questioning is why Mori, Shimada, YA's editorial department and the assistants thought this format was going to work given how little they apparently knew and what shortcuts and sacrifices were going to be necessary. Why do it like that instead of sticking with Mori's original plan. Because as it stands, the purported goal of the project – to faithfully convey Miura's vision for the rest of the story – isn't much of a success. It is a legitimate question.
I would never dream of thinking I'm in a better position than someone's best friend to determine whether or not it was the right decision to try to make the continuation. [...] It is my belief that Studio Gaga and Mori are doing the right thing to try and finish the work *even if* the end result is bad, because I have no reason to doubt the sincerity of their belief that it's what Miura would've wanted. [...] I wish people would stop acting like they're in a better position than Mori to decide if this continuation was the right thing to do.
These repeated appeals to emotion about sincerity and friendship are fallacious and irrelevant. This isn't a contest to determine who loved Miura the most. It's about whether or not the stated goals of the project are being achieved competently. Mori was uniquely positioned to ensure whatever Hakusensha did would honor Miura's legacy and do him justice. As his best friend and fellow mangaka, he was the only one in the world who could do it. And he dropped the ball. Not just that, but he made us promises when the project started that he did not keep. These are facts.
Now, you say you don't mind if it's bad because you believe in these people's belief that they are doing the right thing. That's a lot of mental gymnastics to justify the fact they probably embarked on this project too quickly/recklessly, can't deliver on their promises and now can't turn back. Personally, I do mind that it's unfaithful to what Miura would have done and I wish you wouldn't lecture us on how we should feel about it, especially since this project wasn't started because Mori had made a pledge to Miura.
See the original announcement and what they say about it. Or just read this interview again and how Mori says he did it as much for himself as for Miura. Not exactly the selfless act you're trying to portray.
We're fans of Miura's work. Mori was like his family.
And as fans, our main role isn't to judge whether Mori believes what he says, but to evaluate what's being produced and determine whether it meets our criteria for quality or not. Is it any good? Worthy of being called "Berserk"? Does it do justice to the series? Would Miura have done things like this? My personal answer to all of these is no. I empathize with Mori and the others, but that stops when they start sullying Miura's legacy, no matter the reason.