Aazealh said:It keeps getting better too. Just wait until you read 5, 6 and 7!![]()
Oh man how could i forget that series? Yeah the books definitely get more complex (in a good way) and epic as they go. And the ending is actually very good I thought.
Aazealh said:It keeps getting better too. Just wait until you read 5, 6 and 7!![]()
general zig said:Has anyone read the Lord of the Ring books?

I can never get tired of reading Dune, Dune Messiah, and Children of Dune.wonderland reject said:I'm enjoying reading the Dune series presently in the preparation for Hunters of Dune, but I fear it will a let down.
general zig said:Has anyone read the Lord of the Ring books?
...Which StarWars books? There have been maaaany. Theres the books for each specific movie if thats what your talking about, and then there are series with new characters, mini-series, and those that take place after Episode 6 I believe.How about the Star Wars books do any of you enjoy them.
My girlfriend has read many of them, and she claims the only ones worth reading for anyone who doesn't literally eat drink and sleep Star Wars are the books written by Timothy Zahn. I've read the first three in his series, and they're definitely a notch above the other shit... But honestly, it's hard to take this kind of sub-genre too seriously. It's really just elaborate fan-fiction with Lucas' stamp of approval (as if he actually follows them).general zig said:How about the Star Wars books do any of you enjoy them.
Walter said:Seriously, the question should be who HASN'T read LotR? I actually re-read through them over the summer and solidified my opinion of "LotR sucks; The Hobbit rules" opinion. I just personally think he was too serious with LotR. It's honestly a chore to read.
Thank you, Aaz, thank you.Aazealh said:Lynch.![]()


Started reading the "Prelude to Dune" trilogy and in some ways it was good but overall the tediousness of the books won out. Also the first 5 chapters to "Hunters of Dune" are on their blog. I'm personally not impressed http://www.dunenovels.com/dune7blog/dune7blog.htmlDenial said:Hunters of Dune? You're not reading that Kevin J. Anderson crap, are you?
C. Walken said:The strange thing is, the prequel books get respectable reviews from general critics, but hammered by other sci-fi authors and sci-fi mags/publications.
I guess the die-hards don't like people messing with a story that has such a rich history
Slightly Green said:Anyway, my girlfriend is pretty much forcing me to read 1984
That's all I really needed, a little reinforcement from trusted advisers. [i'm pretty easy.Aazealh said:It's a great book, a definite classic, and it's still as relevant as it was back then.
]I've sat down at a few of those gigantic coffee litterature retail places and tried to read a few of these books, and thats exactly whats wrong with the style of writing. I sometimes have to re-read a few pages of Frank's work to get the full scope of the situation, where-as Anderson and Brian's works paints too much of a straight-forward picture. It gives you a stunning visceral representation, but lacks Frank's balanced approach where things teetered between intuition and reason.Denial said:Shamefully I must admit I've read the first 3 Kevin J. Anderson books, as I bought the first one and it takes more than just mediocrity to get me to stop a series once I've started it. The prequel books aren't horrible, but the distance they fall from Herbert's work makes you realize they really shouldn't have been made. It was a sad ploy by Brian to cash in with a writer who isn't even well-respected. Anderson is good at churning out books (I think he does like 6+ a year, insane really), but he doesn't really "get" it -- The original books seem to be at least 50% psychological, whereas Anderson reminds me more of the movies -- Instead of letting the psychology and intrigue simmer, he turns it into a spectacle.