Okay, I can say that if I get flamed for asking/stating this, that I am fully aware of what might be said against me.
Now. For some reason, there is something about Griffith as a person that has never sat quite right with me. Pre-Eclipse to be more precise (mainly during the Golden Age arc). And I am not quite clear on why that is.
I have always seen Griffith as an incomplete figure, almost pathetic in a sense. Regardless of everything that he had accomplished. Maybe when comparing him to other "male" characters he lacks some stereotypically masculine attributes, but that shouldn't matter that much. Still, even now, I view him as incomplete and lacking. He as an individual seems weak and very insecure to me.
Has anyone else felt the same way about him? Or other characters in the story? Still this is how I feel. Feel free to have fun at my expense.
Now. For some reason, there is something about Griffith as a person that has never sat quite right with me. Pre-Eclipse to be more precise (mainly during the Golden Age arc). And I am not quite clear on why that is.
I have always seen Griffith as an incomplete figure, almost pathetic in a sense. Regardless of everything that he had accomplished. Maybe when comparing him to other "male" characters he lacks some stereotypically masculine attributes, but that shouldn't matter that much. Still, even now, I view him as incomplete and lacking. He as an individual seems weak and very insecure to me.
Has anyone else felt the same way about him? Or other characters in the story? Still this is how I feel. Feel free to have fun at my expense.