Walter said:
Actually, Casca might provide the emotional clarity Guts needs in those situations. She's already a constant reminder of the evils Griffith has wrought. Having her sober in those situations, not simply crying out in confusion, might simplify things (

:"Kill 'im!")
Heh heh, yeah, I don't think anything about it is going to get simplified though. It would be awesome if she was that determined actually, whatever she thinks. My question regards this; Casca's first encounter with Griffith is what birthed that fierce woman, and what he did to her at the Eclipse destroyed her. So, when she comes back, is she going to be that strong woman again, now scorned and free of Griffith's yoke, or someone whose world, to the core of her being, has still been shattered? We don't even know what she's going to remember, of her past, the eclipse, and since then.
Walter said:
Yeah, right before he raped her.
I did touch upon that paramount fact in the complete quote, thank you.
Also, again, it seems simple enough, but it might be too easy to make it that black and white with her. Objectively it is that simple, but I don't think Casca's objective, at the moment she's literally insane over it, and just because she becomes coherent doesn't mean she's going to suddenly have clarity, or even be able to deal with it rationally. Not saying she won't come to see Griffith for what he is, but that even she's going to struggle with the answer of what to do about it.
Walter said:
That statement could mean so many things, though.
Yeah, on a number of subjects too. It could be referencing her sanity itself, like would Guts be forcing it on her before she's ready. Perhaps something we should revisit on it's own.
Walter said:
But my mind always jumps to the conflict that could present itself of their son being an integral part of Griffith -- the same problem that's reared its head in both ep 175 and ep 182. Guts' instinctual reaction might be to kill his enemy, and Casca's might be to protect her son. Of course ... neither of them realize that aspect of Griffith yet. And not to muddle things further but ... maybe after she's awakened, Casca will remember something about that encounter with Griffith on the Hill of Swords. How there was something 'familiar' about him.
Muddle away, please! There's really no avoiding it, because even with the Hill of Swords encounter, we don't know how much of it was Griffith's, or the child's, presence she was responding to. It's likely a combination of both, though the presence of the child isn't addressed except on Griffith's end, so read dryly, she's reacting to the image of Griffith. In any case, interesting that she wasn't afraid of him, but reached out. Anyway, like everything else, it could go either way, the presence of the child could the one thing stopping her from wanting to hurt Griffith, or the one thing that makes it so she has to.
Walter said:
With all these factors in play, again I simply find it ridiculous to assume that she WON'T play a role in the future, and would rather just ignore everything that's happened to her once she's faced with reality.
That's a bit of strawman though, the statement was that it's unclear she'd even want to oppose him (which would be a huge burden to undertake, regardless of how she feels about him and what he did to her), not that she'd play no role in the future.