Griffith
With the streak of a tear, Like morning dew
trapped_soul said:Ok I admit one thing: it's not perfect. perfect might be the wrong term for it, since it can't be any better then. That's true and I withdraw that "perfect".
Wow! I'm so proud of you! Hey, maybe in a few years you'll even realise it's not very good. I'm sure they'll have more "stunningly perfect" CGI by then, anyway.
trapped_soul said:But I think it's stunning. It's outstanding. And it's way more than a random movements & flashlights piece of shit. But you wouldn't admit that even once.
Because I don't feel that way. If it impresses you, that's super duper, but don't just blow it off when people point out real flaws in that perception. Are positions aren't equal, my position is simply that it sucks, you were claiming it was a "stunningly perfect achievment." Obviously, that's a much higher standard with a greater burden of proof (impossible is more like it). It's fine if it's your personal favorite, but don't act like it's objectively the best thing ever made and we should all just see that.
not close to a 100. and not a single one i would support.
Of course not, it's so stunningly not-quite perfect, and reading reasons why it's not might get in the way of that unfounded opinion, right? Speaking of which, why don't you answer to CnC's in-depth critique of the graphics and animation? Why waste time arguing with a bad guy like me? Aren't you going to blow him away with your awesome reasons for why it's good?
He wrote a huge post explaining why it's not so good and you just ignored it. This is exactly why I stopped wasting time trying to have intelligent debates in these situations. You say I've changed, well look in the mirror and see why. Oh, and reply to CnC if there's any real strength to your convictions here.
trapped_soul said:and please do me a favour and post another of your pictures now. may every stupid shit on this board enjoy it.
You'd probably think it was perfect.