Walter said:I just hope Rockstar doesn't start taking itself too seriously. The cutscenes in GTAIII and Vice City were the worst aspect of those games, in my opinion.
Walter said:I don't think I'll be playing this for many years to come,
Aazealh said:Driving is way more realistic, but most of all the gun fights are now enjoyable as opposed to the chore they were previously (at least to me).
Vampire_Hunter_Bob said:I flat out stopped playing the game series because the gun fighting was so atrocious. It looks like it's improved a lot. How is it?
CnC said:I look at ign's 10.0 fairly suspiciously, as the idea of a "exclusive" review is pretty retarded which all but guarantees that the enthusiast press should never be taken seriously.
CnC said:You got yourself a 360/Ps3, Aaz?
CnC said:the premise is fairly uncompelling.
Vampire_Hunter_Bob said:X-play did give it a 5/5. Granted this game is being given a lot of praise, did you give the online play a chance or no?
CnC said:Yea most places are giving it top scores (x-play is kind of a junk show tho, isn't it? I haven't seen it in a while). I was speaking more to the idea of the exclusive, embargoed opinion.
In some respects (scenario, dialogue, humor, mission and location variety) San Andreas is superior IMHO
Walter said:IGN has given it a 10, which previously was a rating given only to Zelda: Ocarina of Time. I don't think I'll be playing this for many years to come, since I don't own nor plan to buy a next-gen console. But I'd like to hear what others think of the game.
IGN's review: http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/869/869381p1.html