I'm convincedWereallmad said:from what I do know, I'm not very happy.
Why doesn't this thread have Revolution in the title? Seems a little unsportsmanlike.
I'm convincedWereallmad said:from what I do know, I'm not very happy.
Because there's no contest. Interpret that how you will.Walter said:Why doesn't this thread have Revolution in the title? Seems a little unsportsmanlike.
That's a little presumptuous considering neither the PS3 or the Revolution are even on the market yet. The Revolution hasn't even been formally unveiled. Just because the Revolution's graphics specs don't meet the ridiculous standards of the PS3 and 360 doesn't mean it won't be able to complete financially. The industry leader is the one who sells the most consoles, and on the whole, can dominate the market with games.Vaxillus said:Because there's no contest. Interpret that how you will.
XD Yeah, perhaps I'm too negative. Maybe that's what Miyamoto meant with his words that they wouldn't be competing with 360 and PS3; that Nintendo has already risen above the competitionyota821 said:Or perhaps you can interpret what Vax said as that the Revolution blows the other two out of the water.
Wereallmad said:I don't yet know enough to be dissapointed with revolution, but from what I do know, I'm not very happy. I really wanted HDTV suport. It's probably going to be the only nintendo console we get for the next 5-6 years or so, so it should be able to accomodate technology like HDTV. Not only that, but it sounds like the revolution wont be able to visually compete with the other two consoles. Definately a downer.
In short, it sounds like this console generation promises to be as uninspiring as the current one.
HawaiianStallion said:stuff
Correct, though I'm not sure Nintendo has so much risen 'above' the competition so much as attempting to compete on a different plane.Walter said:XD Yeah, perhaps I'm too negative. Maybe that's what Miyamoto meant with his words that they wouldn't be competing with 360 and PS3; that Nintendo has already risen above the competition
Wereallmad said:I hate when people do this. What makes you think explaining nintendo's rational (not that I hadn't heard it already from nintendo themselves. I think it's a load of crap, btw) would change my opinion?
Guess what? I don't care. I don't agree with the decision. I still want HDTV support and am still dissapointed by the fact that nintendo will not be supporting it.
Yeah, me tooIsolatioN said:Well, I think I'm going to stay out of the next-gen war. This time around I'm just going to stick with my PC for gaming, I think.
Vaxillus said:Well, if that's how much it costs, I won't be getting a PS3 for a looooong time.
Mr Kutaragi blamed the European delay on problems in mass producing elements of the high-definition Blu-ray disc drives in the machines.
Uriel said:I don't think it it will affect many people on this board, but it damaged Sony's reputation with more broken promises.
Uriel said:PlayStation 3 Euro launch delayed.
CnC said:I still haven't heard they're going into production.
Aazealh said:Way to go. Got a problem? Ok, let's sacrifice Europe! Since we're talking about Sony being cheap bastards, the PS3 will be sold without a HDMI cable, even in its better, $600 version. People will have to fork $20 on their own aside from the console to play in HD.
CnC said:As far as the global markets go I don't see them postponing the Japanese and American markets anytime soon. Europe gets the shaft once again.
In the U.S., about 400,000 PlayStation 3 machines will be available when they go on sale Nov. 17. About 100,000 will be available on the Nov. 11 Japan launch date.
Although Sony had initially counted on shipping 4 million PlayStation 3 machines worldwide by the end of the year, that will likely fall to 2 million