CnC said:I think an entire cg movie is a good move for this sort of thing.
Slightly Green said:That said, they looked more like frogs than turtles....
I saw that in concert and even at 7 years old, left halfway through it. Anyway, I still have the tape I got at Pizza Hut which includes "April's Love Ballad," and some song about doing your homework. Maybe I should rip it ..."Griffith No More!" said:P.P.S. Anyway, they totally sold out with the Comin' Out of Their Shells Tour, man.
The movie was fairly impressive considering countless failed adaptations of movies and whatnot, but I still liked Eastman and Laird's original work more. If the cartoon elements of the original movies disappear and stay true to the original concept, it could be impressive. Unfortunately, that Mickey scene is proving it will still have the cartoon feel to it somewhat."Griffith No More!" said:For some reason I hate that aspect of it; I think I had my fill of "cartoon" CGI with Toy Story. It really doesn't do much for me (except make me think "this movie already looks dated"), and I suspect everyone else is just pretending to care. =)
P.S. Can we all stop with the pining for the mythical "darker original comic series" that never existed as we remember; let's not forget that it started out as a parody of Marvel comics and quickly became the merchandising juggernaut it still is (just because it was darker than the cartoon doesn't mean it was Sin City). If the turtles ever had some sort of intense, dark integrity, it lasted about ten minutes. =)
Slightly Green said:it never really mattered to me what this looked like, I'm going to see it anyway.
That said, they looked more like frogs than turtles....
Sparnage said:BTW That reason you hate that aspect of it among others sounds mostly like you are boycotting this movie for messing with your childhood memories. The teaser has barely shown anything, and you have already decided you hate it.
Sparnage said:Just because the comics weren't on a violence level with Berserk, they were significantly darker than the movies based on it. More blood, more adult concepts, less comic relief, less cheesy one liners, less pizza.
If I had a scanner I would show a few pages to show how different it was, and I liked seeing the concept that way when I discovered it in my teenage years.
Sparnage said:Their supposed "frog look" does somewhat resemble the original drawings, and that's allot of why I think this could be good as a more worthy tribute.
"Griffith No More!" said:Thanks for the analysis doc; actually, my point was pretty clearly that I just don't care for CGI animation in general, nothing to do with the turtles, other than I don't see what's so great or fitting about them being CGI frog-lizards (unless you're desperate for this sort of turtle revival *cough*).
I've seen them before, thanks. Again, my point was more that the turtle's took off with merchandising, and even Laird and Eastman got so involved with that they couldn't even draw the turtles themselves anymore. So, this idea that it got away from it's "serious roots" is sort of a cliche misnomer; as enjoyable the comics were, the turtles are what they are because they changed. It's likely the only reason any of us has heard of them, read the comics, and the only reason this movie is being made.
Anyway, I just think it's funny because it's a conversation about every comic to movie adaptation, and with the turtles it's especially ridiculous. It's really come full circle as this is what they were satirizing in the first place, but now it has to be the SERIOUS Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles! Actually, it's so ridiculous I like the idea now; let's take it even further and make the Citizen Kane of turtle movies.
Well, I'm glad we're not getting hung up on our childhood and letting it affect our judgement or anything. =)
P.S. I will say, this is better than trying another live-action movie. At least it's giving us a different look.
Why? Character exploration sounds like it'd make a better movie than wacky ninja antics to me. Then again, we're talking about CGI frog-lizards. Maybe it's not the best direction for the movie.Sparnage said:"Strange events are occurring in New York City, and the Turtles are needed more than ever, but Raphael, Donatello, and Michelangelo have become lost and direction less. With the city at stake, it's up to Leonardo and Zen Master Splinter to restore unity and ninja discipline to the Turtles."
I just.... don't know.
Slightly Green said:it never really mattered to me what this looked like, i'm going to see it anyway.
That said, they looked more like frogs than turtles....
Sparnage said:I'm not about to make my fundamental decision on a obscure teaser.
Sparnage said:Meh. Whatever hidden manipulative agendas those evil Producers and marketing people use to draw us in, we will still come out of the cinemas knowing the movie to be either good, average or shit.
Sparnage said:I just.... don't know.
Walter said:Why? Character exploration sounds like it'd make a better movie than wacky ninja antics to me. Then again, we're talking about CGI frog-lizards. Maybe it's not the best direction for the movie.
TheSkyTraveller said:I was a huge Turtles fan growing up; sadly, I also saw the Comin' Out of their Shells Tour
(:-[), but I guess I just got old, 'cause I could care less now. The trailer looks kinda amatureish to me.
SaiyajinNoOuji said:I remember thinking holy shit! I want to be a ninja too if I can have all that stuff!
Slightly Green said:I remember thinking how bad cigarettes were for you.
My, how things change....
Walter said:Anyway, I still have the tape I got at Pizza Hut which includes "April's Love Ballad," and some song about doing your homework. Maybe I should rip it ...
cause a person wearing a 45 pound costume can't move the way they want them too? Cause pulling off, at least my, if not the general public's current perception of ninja mobility would require them to do the turtles themselves as CGI most of the time anyways? Cause they didn't want to use special effects that will look like crap in 10 years when they could go with stylized animation thats fairly timeless?TheBeast43105 said:I thought the costumes that the actors wore in the original movie were fine, i havent seen the trailer so i cant say anything about the cgi, but i dont see why they couldnt just have actors in costumes like before.
Majin Tenshi said:cause a person wearing a 45 pound costume can't move the way they want them too? Cause pulling off, at least my, if not the general public's current perception of ninja mobility would require them to do the turtles themselves as CGI most of the time anyways?
Majin Tenshi said:Cause they didn't want to use special effects that will look like crap in 10 years
Majin Tenshi said:when they could go with stylized animation thats fairly timeless?
"Griffith No More!" said:Pop culture "ninja mobility" is horseshit anyway, first of all, and they could still do it with CGI if not with practical effects and the right stunt people. Gimmie a break.
Best 6' turtles I ever seen, better than any CGI so far anyway. 80's and early 90's puppets and costumes OWN CGI.
You mean that already looks dated right now? =)
TheBeast43105 said:Thank you!!! I find that the turtles looked fantastic in the original film and they seemed to move perfectly fine in the fight scenes they had. CGI is WAY overrelied on these days, and i personally think that old-fashioned turtle suits would be the way to go.
TheBeast43105 said:i dont see why they couldnt just have actors in costumes like before.